Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Released August 2011

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is pretty close but the 6020 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

The 6020 was manufactured 18 months before the GXR Mount A12 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the 6020 grades versus the GXR Mount A12 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
6020 | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus 6020
GXR Mount A12 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 18 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
6020 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 provides external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has specifications of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the 6020 and the GXR Mount A12.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and GXR Mount A12 is 95 and 84 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The visual below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and GXR Mount A12.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 6020 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus 6020 will result in extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older 6020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2011-08-05 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/9000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 9.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 370g (0.82 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $279 | $349 |