Clicky

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
32
Overall
33
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
 
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front
Portability
84
Imaging
53
Features
39
Overall
47

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs

Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
Ricoh GXR Mount A12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
  • Released August 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is pretty close but the 6020 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The 6020 was manufactured 18 months before the GXR Mount A12 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the 6020 grades versus the GXR Mount A12 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

				

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 6020 GXR Mount A12 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus 6020

 GXR Mount A12 6020 
ReleasedAugust 2011February 2010Fresher by 18 months
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 6020 GXR Mount A12 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 provides external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has specifications of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the 6020 and the GXR Mount A12.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and GXR Mount A12 is 95 and 84 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The visual below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and GXR Mount A12.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 6020 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus 6020 will result in extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older 6020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus 6020
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
27
good MP (13 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
55
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus 6020 Street photography details
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Street photography details
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than average (122g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
65
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus 6020 Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sports photography details
42
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (13MP)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
39
maximum shutter speed is high (1/9,000 seconds)
good sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus 6020
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
70
lighter than average (122 grams)
weather sealing
good MP (13MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
60
flash built-in
good max aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse recording
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 6020 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Landscape photography highlights
40
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (13MP)
weather sealing
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse function
52
you can focus manually
good max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3")
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no liveview
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 as a Vlogging camera
31
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (122g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone socket
26
good max aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
 Olympus Stylus Tough 6020Ricoh GXR Mount A12
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Also called as mju Tough 6020 -
Type Waterproof Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2010-02-02 2011-08-05
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 13MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 2848
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/3.9-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 1/4s 1s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/9000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m 9.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 122g (0.27 lbs) 370g (0.82 lbs)
Physical dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 330 photos
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (5 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $279 $349