Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh PX
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh PX, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the PX (16MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 6020 was manufactured 18 months prior to the PX which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the 6020 grades against the PX when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Ricoh PX. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh PX
6020 | PX |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus 6020
PX | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | February 2010 | Newer by 18 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh PX
6020 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen size | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 has got physical dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh PX in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the 6020 versus the PX.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and PX is 95 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and PX.
To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh PX to produce extra detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh PX |
Alternative name | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3072 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lb) | 156 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $279 | $329 |