Olympus 6020 vs Samsung DV150F
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 6020 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus 6020 and Samsung DV150F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the DV150F (16MP) is very well matched and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 6020 was announced 3 years earlier than the DV150F which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the 6020 matches up against the DV150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 6020 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Samsung DV150F. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Samsung DV150F
| 6020 | DV150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus 6020
| DV150F | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 35 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Samsung DV150F
| 6020 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 comes with external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung DV150F has dimensions of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 6020 and Samsung DV150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the 6020 and the DV150F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and DV150F is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The picture here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and DV150F.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung DV150F to give extra detail with its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged 6020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus 6020 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Samsung DV150F |
| Also called | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $279 | $150 |