Clicky

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Other Name is mju Tough 6020
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2008
  • Renewed by Sony A330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 Overview

Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and A300 (10MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The 6020 was announced 2 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go through a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the 6020 scores vs the A300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony A300

 6020 A300 
RevealedFebruary 2010January 2008More recent by 25 months

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus 6020

 A300 6020 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony A300

 6020 A300 
Display dimension2.7"2.7"Identical display measurement
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 has exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Look at the Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the 6020 compared to the A300.

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and A300 is 95 and 64 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and A300.

As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 6020 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus 6020 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher 6020 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus 6020
Portrait photography with Sony A300
28
megapixel count decent (13 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
59
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (10MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus 6020
Street photography with Sony A300
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competitors in class (122 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
74
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 6020
Sports photography with Sony A300
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (13 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
54
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus 6020 Travel photography features
Sony A300 Travel photography features
70
lighter than competitors in class (122 grams)
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (13MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
45
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 6020 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A300 Landscape photography highlights
40
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (13 megapixels)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
57
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
MP count low (10 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A300 as a Vlogging camera
31
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (122g)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
9
no video shooting
Photography Glossary

Olympus 6020 vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 6020 and Sony A300
 Olympus Stylus Tough 6020Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Otherwise known as mju Tough 6020 -
Category Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2010-02-02 2008-01-30
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 13 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.9-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/4 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 122 gr (0.27 lbs) 632 gr (1.39 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 64
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 538
Other
Battery ID Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal Compact Flash
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $279 $0