Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX99
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Introduced September 2018

Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX99 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus 6020 versus Sony HX99, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) posses different sensor sizes.

The 6020 was released 9 years earlier than the HX99 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the 6020 grades against the HX99 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony HX99
6020 | HX99 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Olympus 6020
HX99 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 104 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3.00" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony HX99
6020 | HX99 |
---|
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6020 has got outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sony HX99 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") having a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
See the Olympus 6020 versus Sony HX99 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the 6020 compared to the HX99.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and HX99 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by reading a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and HX99.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 6020 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony HX99 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged 6020 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2018-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3.00 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 pounds) | 242g (0.53 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $279 | $469 |