Olympus 6020 vs Sony WX500
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
91 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
Olympus 6020 vs Sony WX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced April 2015
- Succeeded the Sony WX350
Olympus 6020 vs Sony WX500 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus 6020 versus Sony WX500, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and WX500 (18MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6020 was announced 6 years before the WX500 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the 6020 grades against the WX500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony WX500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Sony WX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony WX500
6020 | WX500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX500 over the Olympus 6020
WX500 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | February 2010 | Newer by 63 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony WX500
6020 | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony WX500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 6020 offers external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony WX500 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 versus Sony WX500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the 6020 against the WX500.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and WX500 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony WX500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The image here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and WX500.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Sony WX500 to give you extra detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged 6020 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony WX500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony WX500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2015-04-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $279 | $348 |