Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ2500
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") use totally different sensor dimensions.

The 8000 was revealed 8 years earlier than the FZ2500 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the 8000 scores against the FZ2500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FZ2500
8000 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus 8000
FZ2500 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 87 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FZ2500
8000 | FZ2500 |
---|
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus 8000 provides external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has specifications of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the 8000 versus the FZ2500.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and FZ2500 is 94 and 53 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The visual here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and FZ2500.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 8000 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will show more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older 8000 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also called | mju Tough 8000 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182g (0.40 lb) | 915g (2.02 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $380 | $998 |