Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ35
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
72 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ35, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 8000 was released 12 months earlier than the FZ35 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 8000 matches up against the FZ35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FZ35
| 8000 | FZ35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus 8000
| FZ35 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2010 | July 2009 | Newer by 12 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FZ35
| 8000 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 8000 has external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") having a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the 8000 against the FZ35.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and FZ35 is 94 and 72 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at specifications. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and FZ35.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos though you will need to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged 8000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8000 | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 pounds) | 397g (0.88 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $380 | $999 |