Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8885a/8885a4e93f33c4e3d4295612c95591b63ab3d9ae" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 front"
68 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 494g - 120 x 80 x 92mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the FZ40 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The 8000 was released 12 months earlier than the FZ40 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ40 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the 8000 matches up versus the FZ40 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Panasonic FZ40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FZ40
8000 | FZ40 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ40 over the Olympus 8000
FZ40 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 12 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FZ40
8000 | FZ40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 has got outer dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ40 has proportions of 120mm x 80mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") along with a weight of 494 grams (1.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the 8000 versus the FZ40.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a3a4/5a3a4da597555959e69a9f3f1060c5e1d34af700" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and FZ40 is 94 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d451f/d451f37ab075bf8f14d6de655c089611626df04d" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 top view buttons comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The image below should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and FZ40.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Panasonic FZ40 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/834f2/834f2b5ab249e4b9ce82c687cfb05c671e51b8a0" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 sensor size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da5f6/da5f63cc9717f75d3ddcb4acbc93b7c8b9654822" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ40 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | Lumix DMC-FZ45 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-01 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 9.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182g (0.40 pounds) | 494g (1.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 120 x 80 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $380 | $420 |