Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ70
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


63 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 606g - 130 x 97 x 118mm
- Announced July 2013

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ70, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and FZ70 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The 8000 was introduced 5 years prior to the FZ70 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the 8000 grades against the FZ70 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Panasonic FZ70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FZ70
8000 | FZ70 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ70 over the Olympus 8000
FZ70 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 49 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FZ70
8000 | FZ70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 comes with outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ70 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") with a weight of 606 grams (1.34 lbs).
See the Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ70 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the 8000 against the FZ70.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and FZ70 is 94 and 63 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and FZ70.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Panasonic FZ70 to give more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 |
Also called as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2013-07-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50i/60i, 25p/30p), 1280 x 720p (50p/60p or 25p/30p), 640 x 480 (25p/30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 grams (0.40 pounds) | 606 grams (1.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 41 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 171 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $380 | $300 |