Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS25
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS20
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS30
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic ZS25, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and ZS25 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 8000 was manufactured 4 years prior to the ZS25 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the 8000 scores versus the ZS25 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic ZS25
| 8000 | ZS25 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus 8000
| ZS25 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 42 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic ZS25
| 8000 | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 8000 has outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS25 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic ZS25 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the 8000 compared to the ZS25.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and ZS25 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The photograph below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and ZS25.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Panasonic ZS25 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8000 | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 15s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $380 | $300 |