Olympus 8000 vs Pentax RZ18
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax RZ18 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus 8000 and Pentax RZ18, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and RZ18 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 8000 was brought out 3 years prior to the RZ18 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the 8000 matches up versus the RZ18 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax RZ18 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Pentax Optio RZ18. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Pentax RZ18 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Pentax RZ18
8000 | RZ18 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ18 over the Olympus 8000
RZ18 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | July 2009 | Fresher by 26 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Pentax RZ18
8000 | RZ18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax RZ18 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 provides outer dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Pentax RZ18 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 8000 and Pentax RZ18 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the 8000 and the RZ18.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and RZ18 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax RZ18 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The graphic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and RZ18.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Pentax RZ18 to give you greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Pentax Optio RZ18 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Pentax Optio RZ18 |
Alternative name | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-01 | 2011-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182g (0.40 lb) | 178g (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $380 | $210 |