Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2010
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe 8000 was introduced 13 months prior to the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the 8000 matches up against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
8000 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus 8000
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2010 | July 2009 | Newer by 13 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
8000 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 8000 versus the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 94 and 85 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The image here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
All in all, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus 8000 to show more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-07-01 | 2010-08-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lb) | 367 grams (0.81 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $380 | $147 |