Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Introduced March 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively well matched but the 8000 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 8000 was revealed 8 months earlier than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the 8000 scores versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| 8000 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus 8000
| GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2010 | July 2009 | More modern by 8 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| 8000 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 comes with physical dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the 8000 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 94 and 85 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 8000 using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus 8000 will give you greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
| Also called | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2010-03-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.5-4.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 lb) | 355g (0.78 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 410 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $380 | $349 |