Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 8000 was released 6 years before the WG-30 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the 8000 scores against the WG-30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Ricoh WG-30
8000 | WG-30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus 8000
WG-30 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2014 | July 2009 | More recent by 64 months |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh WG-30
8000 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the 8000 versus the WG-30.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and WG-30 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and WG-30.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-30 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older 8000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Other name | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 192 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $380 | $428 |