Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 8000 was manufactured 11 years before the WG-70 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the 8000 scores versus the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Ricoh WG-70
8000 | WG-70 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus 8000
WG-70 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | July 2009 | Newer by 129 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh WG-70
8000 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen size | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 has got outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the 8000 vs the WG-70.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and WG-70 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and WG-70.
As you can see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to produce more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh WG-70 |
Alternative name | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2020-02-04 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182g (0.40 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $380 | $280 |