Clicky

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front
 
Ricoh WG-70 front
Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs

Olympus 8000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Announced February 2020
  • Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The 8000 was manufactured 11 years before the WG-70 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the 8000 scores versus the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Ricoh WG-70

 8000 WG-70 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus 8000

 WG-70 8000 
AnnouncedFebruary 2020July 2009Newer by 129 months
Manually focus Dial exact focusing

Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh WG-70

 8000 WG-70 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen size
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 has got outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Examine the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the 8000 vs the WG-70.

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and WG-70 is 94 and 91 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and WG-70.

As you can see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to produce more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 8000 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Portrait photography camera
21
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
42
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus 8000 Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Street photography highlights
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus 8000 Sports photography advice
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography advice
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
50
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus 8000
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-70
61
weather proof
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
71
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 8000 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography advice
35
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual mode
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
49
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7")
no manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8000 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging highlights
28
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone port
33
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 8000 and Ricoh WG-70
 Olympus Stylus Tough 8000Ricoh WG-70
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 Ricoh WG-70
Alternative name mju Tough 8000 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2009-07-01 2020-02-04
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range 2cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 1/4s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On On, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 182g (0.40 lbs) 193g (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse feature
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $380 $280