Clicky

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Olympus 8000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Also Known as mju Tough 8000
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Here, we are comparing the Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The 8000 was manufactured 5 years before the WB350F which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the 8000 scores vs the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Samsung WB350F

 8000 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus 8000

 WB350F 8000 
IntroducedJanuary 2014July 2009More modern by 55 months
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Samsung WB350F

 8000 WB350F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 provides external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Check the Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the 8000 compared to the WB350F.

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and WB350F is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and WB350F.

As you have seen, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB350F to resolve more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 8000 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography highlights
21
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
40
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus 8000 Street photography factors
Samsung WB350F Street photography factors
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus 8000 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Sports photography highlights
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
50
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus 8000 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Travel photography highlights
61
weather proofing
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competition (276 grams)
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
missing Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 8000 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography highlights
35
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
50
you can focus manually
pretty wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 8000
Vlogging with Samsung WB350F
28
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
34
pretty wide (23mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (276 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 8000 and Samsung WB350F
 Olympus Stylus Tough 8000Samsung WB350F
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 Samsung WB350F
Also called mju Tough 8000 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-07-01 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 2cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/4 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m -
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 182 grams (0.40 pounds) 276 grams (0.61 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $380 $260