Clicky

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Olympus 8000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Here, we are matching up the Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The 8000 was brought out 4 years before the WB800F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the 8000 grades versus the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Samsung WB800F

 8000 WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus 8000

 WB800F 8000 
ReleasedJanuary 2013July 2009More recent by 42 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Samsung WB800F

 8000 WB800F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 enjoys outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check out the Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the 8000 compared to the WB800F.

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The graphic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and WB800F.

All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to resolve extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 8000 Portrait photography features
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography features
21
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
44
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus 8000 Street photography advice
Samsung WB800F Street photography advice
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 8000
Sports photography with Samsung WB800F
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
53
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking focus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus 8000 Travel photography features
Samsung WB800F Travel photography features
61
environment proof
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competition (218g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
no Timelapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus 8000
Landscape photography with Samsung WB800F
35
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
50
you can focus manually
rather wide (23mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8000 Vlogging advice
Samsung WB800F Vlogging advice
28
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
35
rather wide (23mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 8000 and Samsung WB800F
 Olympus Stylus Tough 8000Samsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 Samsung WB800F
Also called as mju Tough 8000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-07-01 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 2cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/4 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m -
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 182 gr (0.40 pounds) 218 gr (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $380 $300