Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 8000 was brought out 4 years before the WB800F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the 8000 grades versus the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Samsung WB800F
8000 | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus 8000
WB800F | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | July 2009 | More recent by 42 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Samsung WB800F
8000 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 enjoys outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the 8000 compared to the WB800F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The graphic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and WB800F.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to resolve extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Samsung WB800F |
Also called as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $380 | $300 |