Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
57 Imaging
55 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Revealed April 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma SD1
Photography Glossary Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus 8000 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is very comparable but the 8000 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 8000 was revealed 3 years earlier than the SD1 Merrill and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the 8000 matches up versus the SD1 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
| 8000 | SD1 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Olympus 8000
| SD1 Merrill | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 33 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
| 8000 | SD1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 has got outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8000 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the 8000 vs the SD1 Merrill.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and SD1 Merrill is 94 and 57 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The graphic below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and SD1 Merrill.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 8000 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will show greater detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older 8000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
| Other name | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2012-04-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4800 x 3200 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 lb) | 790g (1.74 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $380 | $2,339 |