Olympus 8000 vs Sigma Quattro
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 8000 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Olympus 8000 versus Sigma Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 8000 was manufactured 7 years prior to the Quattro and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the 8000 matches up against the Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8000 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sigma Quattro
| 8000 | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus 8000
| Quattro | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 | July 2009 | Fresher by 80 months | |
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sigma Quattro
| 8000 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8000 versus Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the 8000 vs the Quattro.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and Quattro is 94 and 63 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and Quattro.
Clearly, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 8000 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sigma Quattro will produce extra detail due to its extra 17 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older 8000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | - |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lb) | 625 grams (1.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $738 |