Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX99
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Introduced September 2018
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX99 Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Olympus 8000 versus Sony HX99, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) provide different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 8000 was manufactured 10 years prior to the HX99 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the 8000 grades vs the HX99 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sony HX99
| 8000 | HX99 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Olympus 8000
| HX99 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2018 | July 2009 | Fresher by 111 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3.00" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sony HX99
| 8000 | HX99 |
|---|
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 offers outer dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sony HX99 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") having a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8000 versus Sony HX99 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the 8000 vs the HX99.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and HX99 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and HX99.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 8000 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX99 will render extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older 8000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2018-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.00" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lbs) | 242 grams (0.53 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $380 | $469 |