Olympus 8000 vs Sony QX30
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
91 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus 8000 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Launched September 2014
Olympus 8000 vs Sony QX30 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus 8000 versus Sony QX30, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Lens-style by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and QX30 (20MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 8000 was brought out 6 years earlier than the QX30 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the 8000 scores versus the QX30 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sony QX30
8000 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 2.7" | " | Larger display (+2.7") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus 8000
QX30 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | July 2009 | More recent by 63 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sony QX30
8000 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 features external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sony QX30 has dimensions of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 8000 versus Sony QX30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the 8000 compared to the QX30.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and QX30 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and QX30.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony QX30 to offer you extra detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2014-09-03 |
Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | - |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | None |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182g (0.40 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $380 | $348 |