Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FX78
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released January 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus 8010 versus Panasonic FX78, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 8010 was brought out 11 months earlier than the FX78 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the 8010 scores versus the FX78 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Panasonic FX78
| 8010 | FX78 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus 8010
| FX78 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 | February 2010 | Newer by 11 months | |
| Display size | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Panasonic FX78
| 8010 | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 offers external measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8010 versus Panasonic FX78 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the 8010 and the FX78.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and FX78 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The picture here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 8010 and FX78.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus 8010 to provide you with extra detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged 8010 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8010 | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2011-01-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) | 142 gr (0.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $600 | $210 |