Clicky

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
35
Features
64
Overall
46

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus 8010
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Additionally Known as mju Tough 8010
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Launched July 2012
  • Succeeded the Panasonic FZ100
  • Replacement is Panasonic FZ300
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The 8010 was introduced 3 years prior to the FZ200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the 8010 matches up versus the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Panasonic FZ200

 8010 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus 8010

 FZ200 8010 
LaunchedJuly 2012February 2010Fresher by 29 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Panasonic FZ200

 8010 FZ200 
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 8010 enjoys outside dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Compare the Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 8010 against the FZ200.

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the 8010 and FZ200 is 92 and 65 respectively.

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 8010 and FZ200.

As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus 8010 to provide more detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older 8010 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 8010 Portrait photography information
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography information
27
decent MP (13MP)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
47
has manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus 8010
Street photography with Panasonic FZ200
58
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than competition (245 grams)
57
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
very small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (588g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus 8010 Sports photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography details
42
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (13 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
low fps (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
46
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (540 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus 8010 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Travel photography camera
63
environment proofing
decent MP (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (245 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
55
better than average battery power (540 shots)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
relatively wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (588g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 8010 Landscape photography information
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography information
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (13 megapixels)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
47
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (540 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8010 Vlogging features
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging features
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competition (245g)
63
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external mic support
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competition (588 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 8010 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus Stylus Tough 8010Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Also called as mju Tough 8010 -
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-02-02 2012-07-18
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 13MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 23
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/4 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 13.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 245 gr (0.54 lb) 588 gr (1.30 lb)
Dimensions 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 37
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 114
Other
Battery life - 540 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $600 $499