Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh WG-4, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 8010 was released 5 years prior to the WG-4 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the 8010 grades vs the WG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Ricoh WG-4
| 8010 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus 8010
| WG-4 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | February 2010 | More recent by 48 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh WG-4
| 8010 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 provides external measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the 8010 compared to the WG-4.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8010 and WG-4 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and WG-4.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older 8010 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Other name | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $600 | $330 |