Olympus 8010 vs Samsung EX2F
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Launched December 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 8010 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus 8010 versus Samsung EX2F, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is fairly comparable but the 8010 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 8010 was brought out 3 years prior to the EX2F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the 8010 scores versus the EX2F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 8010 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Samsung EX2F
| 8010 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus 8010
| EX2F | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | February 2010 | More recent by 35 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Samsung EX2F
| 8010 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 provides outside dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has specifications of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8010 versus Samsung EX2F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the 8010 vs the EX2F.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and EX2F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8010 and EX2F.
Clearly, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 8010 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus 8010 will provide extra detail having its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older 8010 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Samsung EX2F |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 294g (0.65 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $600 | $478 |