Olympus 8010 vs Samsung WB35F
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Released February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 8010 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus 8010 and Samsung WB35F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 8010 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WB35F which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the 8010 grades vs the WB35F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 8010 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Samsung WB35F
| 8010 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus 8010
| WB35F | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 47 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Samsung WB35F
| 8010 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 8010 enjoys exterior measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8010 and Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the 8010 against the WB35F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The picture underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 8010 and WB35F.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB35F to offer greater detail due to its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 8010 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Samsung WB35F |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $600 | $130 |