Clicky

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
68
Features
56
Overall
63

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Olympus 8010
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
  • Introduced February 2010
  • Additionally Known as mju Tough 8010
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2016
Photography Glossary

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The 8010 was introduced 7 years prior to the Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the 8010 grades against the Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sigma Quattro

 8010 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus 8010

 Quattro 8010 
RevealedFebruary 2016February 2010Newer by 73 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1620k230kCrisper display (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sigma Quattro

 8010 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 8010 comes with physical dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Look at the Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the 8010 compared to the Quattro.

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8010 and Quattro is 92 and 63 respectively.

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The image underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 8010 and Quattro.

Plainly, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 8010 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro will give greater detail using its extra 16MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged 8010 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 8010 Portrait photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography highlights
27
MP count decent (13 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
80
you can focus manually
MP count fantastic (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus 8010 Street photography factors
Sigma Quattro Street photography factors
58
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competition (245g)
59
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition (625g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus 8010 Sports photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Sports photography highlights
42
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (13MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proofing
low fps (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
69
MP count fantastic (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proof
supports phase detect autofocus
max frames per second very slow (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus 8010 Travel photography factors
Sigma Quattro Travel photography factors
63
environment proofing
MP count decent (13 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (245g)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
54
weather proof
MP count fantastic (29MP)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (625g)
display is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 8010 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
39
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (13 megapixels)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7")
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
72
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3")
MP count fantastic (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8010 Vlogging features
Sigma Quattro Vlogging features
27
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (245g)
22
includes face detection autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video ( pixels)
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competition (625g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 8010 and Sigma Quattro
 Olympus Stylus Tough 8010Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Make Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 Sigma sd Quattro
Also Known as mju Tough 8010 -
Category Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2010-02-02 2016-02-23
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 13 megapixels 29 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.9-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 1,620 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 -
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 245 grams (0.54 lbs) 625 grams (1.38 lbs)
Physical dimensions 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID Li-50B BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $600 $738