Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Photography Glossary Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 8010 was introduced 7 years prior to the Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the 8010 grades against the Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sigma Quattro
| 8010 | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus 8010
| Quattro | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 | February 2010 | Newer by 73 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sigma Quattro
| 8010 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 8010 comes with physical dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the 8010 compared to the Quattro.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8010 and Quattro is 92 and 63 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The image underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 8010 and Quattro.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 8010 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro will give greater detail using its extra 16MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged 8010 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 3.8fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $738 |