Olympus 8010 vs Sony TX30
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Olympus 8010 vs Sony TX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 141g - 96 x 59 x 15mm
- Announced July 2013
Olympus 8010 vs Sony TX30 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus 8010 vs Sony TX30, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and TX30 (18MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 8010 was introduced 4 years before the TX30 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the 8010 grades against the TX30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony TX30 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Sony TX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sony TX30
8010 | TX30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX30 over the Olympus 8010
TX30 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | February 2010 | Newer by 42 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3.3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sony TX30
8010 | TX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Sony TX30 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8010 enjoys outside measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony TX30 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8010 vs Sony TX30 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the 8010 compared to the TX30.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the 8010 and TX30 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony TX30 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The picture below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 8010 and TX30.
All in all, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Sony TX30 to give you more detail using its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged 8010 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony TX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8010 vs Sony TX30 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 |
Also called | mju Tough 8010 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2013-07-26 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3.3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 141g (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 96 x 59 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $600 | $230 |