Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS25
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Panasonic ZS25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS20
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS30
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS25, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the ZS25 (16MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-850 iHS was announced 13 months after the ZS25 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TG-850 iHS grades versus the ZS25 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Panasonic ZS25
| TG-850 iHS | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 13 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| ZS25 | TG-850 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Panasonic ZS25
| TG-850 iHS | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS enjoys outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS25 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS25 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-850 iHS versus the ZS25.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-850 iHS and ZS25 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The pic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-850 iHS and ZS25.
All in all, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution so you should expect comparable quality of files but you may want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-850 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS Portrait photography advice
Panasonic ZS25 Portrait photography advice
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
good megapixels (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
Street photography with Panasonic ZS25
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
environment proof
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch focus
lighter than competitors in class (193 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS25 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proof
good battery power (330 per charge)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
low max shutter speed (1/1,200 seconds)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (260 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS25
good battery power (330 per charge)
environment proof
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (21mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competitors in class (193 grams)
boasts touch focus
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (480mm)
no Timelapse function
terrible battery power (260 shots)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic ZS25 Landscape photography highlights
decently wide (21mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
environment proof
good battery power (330 shots)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
terrible battery power (260 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS Vlogging info
Panasonic ZS25 Vlogging info
decently wide (21mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone socket
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (193g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.40 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218 grams (0.48 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | 260 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $250 | $300 |