Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh PX
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced August 2011
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh PX Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh PX, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the PX (16MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-850 iHS was manufactured 2 years later than the PX and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-850 iHS matches up versus the PX with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Ricoh PX. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Ricoh PX
TG-850 iHS | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | August 2011 | More recent by 30 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
PX | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh PX
TG-850 iHS | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-850 iHS has got external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-850 iHS against the PX.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-850 iHS and PX is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-850 iHS and PX.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you will need to take the age of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-850 iHS provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh PX |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4608 x 3072 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | 156 gr (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $250 | $329 |