Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-850 iHS was unveiled within a month of the WG-4 GPS and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TG-850 iHS grades versus the WG-4 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TG-850 iHS | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
WG-4 GPS | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TG-850 iHS | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | February 2014 | Similar generation | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS has got physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-850 iHS vs the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-850 iHS and WG-4 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The picture below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-850 iHS and WG-4 GPS.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of files although you should always factor the release date of the products into consideration.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 240 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $250 | $210 |