Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB700
91 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced December 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Samsung WB700, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-850 iHS was launched 3 years later than the WB700 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-850 iHS grades against the WB700 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Samsung WB700. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Samsung WB700
| TG-850 iHS | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | December 2010 | Fresher by 38 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| WB700 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Samsung WB700
| TG-850 iHS | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-850 iHS has external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-850 iHS compared to the WB700.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-850 iHS and WB700 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading through specs. The graphic here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-850 iHS and WB700.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-850 iHS to give you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher TG-850 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Samsung WB700 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Full resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $300 |