Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is relatively close but the TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-850 iHS was unveiled within a month of the DP2 Quattro so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TG-850 iHS grades against the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
TG-850 iHS | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
DP2 Quattro | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Sigma DP2 Quattro
TG-850 iHS | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | February 2014 | Same age | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS features exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the TG-850 iHS against the DP2 Quattro.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-850 iHS and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-850 iHS and DP2 Quattro.
As you can see, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-850 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-01-29 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) | 395 grams (0.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $250 | $931 |