Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49476/49476823376bf1f79d845d8994f5bd8b0081bd2b" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ front Olympus SP-590 UZ front"
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Updated by Olympus SP-600 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus SP-590 UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and SP-590 UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM2 was announced 4 years after the SP-590 UZ which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-PM2 grades vs the SP-590 UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus SP-590 UZ. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-PM2 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus E-PM2
SP-590 UZ | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-PM2 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 has got outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus SP-590 UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus SP-590 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PM2 vs the SP-590 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e24a/3e24af6f2a1a88c7b60bc421c46500be0e18a80b" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and SP-590 UZ is 89 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9888f/9888faac32fc2ce9e2771dc6ff28e19c5ac49811" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and SP-590 UZ.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will offer you greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger E-PM2 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/793fc/793fc626db27aaa5cb20213c60c2ab81dbe191a1" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/008cc/008ccbdc9789ecfff1e73b2a7a3b4489ff134932" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SP-590 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SP-590 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2009-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 8.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 413g (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $448 | $249 |