Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/708ca/708ca63198576f0ffc46689e66eb690a812d18d4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front"
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
- Renewed by Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic FZ35, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and FZ35 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-860 was released 4 years after the FZ35 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the TG-860 matches up vs the FZ35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-860 Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Panasonic FZ35
TG-860 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 56 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus TG-860
FZ35 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic FZ35
TG-860 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-860 comes with outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has proportions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic FZ35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-860 compared to the FZ35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a455/6a455a4a5d1f417963e44c11ee78e0670c6a534d" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and FZ35 is 91 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b49d6/b49d68a412279d2e6f92ebc0c7428e1881226ad9" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-860 and FZ35.
To sum up, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus TG-860 to offer more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer TG-860 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d39df/d39dfce520bdb5d0566ec258cbb22b0c001bc966" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50c91/50c91fcfdcd13fdb7690e47a3f16dc18c37b6b2f" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 8.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lb) | 397 gr (0.88 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $279 | $999 |