Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2fa3/f2fa3d67cbb32681bfe51b0d7c80eb07478300a0" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 131g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus TG-860 versus Panasonic SZ1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-860 (16MP) and the SZ1 (16MP) is relatively similar and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-860 was brought out 3 years after the SZ1 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic SZ1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-860 matches up against the SZ1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery and Panasonic SZ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Panasonic SZ1
TG-860 | SZ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 38 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ1 over the Olympus TG-860
SZ1 | TG-860 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic SZ1
TG-860 | SZ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-860 has outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Panasonic SZ1 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 131 grams (0.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-860 versus Panasonic SZ1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-860 vs the SZ1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9208/f92083b3e91c981c5af09f7ddbc6c73d42666282" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-860 and SZ1 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0223d/0223de45533702a75f4ced0e01102fd4eb489dcd" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-860 and SZ1.
Clearly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP so you should expect similar quality of pictures however you would want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher TG-860 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acc7e/acc7e3a0f4e8246bc42a3dbcce78363fdc9fa4c2" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec193/ec1934c6ccd8da6bf1366543e084e02853addeca" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic SZ1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lbs) | 131 gr (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 250 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $279 | $179 |