Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12c81/12c817401ce2f8957e577f0ee287d1054036861a" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front"
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Launched June 2008
- Replacement is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-860 and Sony A350, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-860 (16MP) and the A350 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the TG-860 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-860 was brought out 6 years later than the A350 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-860 grades against the A350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Sony A350
TG-860 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | June 2008 | Fresher by 82 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus TG-860
A350 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Sony A350
TG-860 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-860 offers outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-860 and Sony A350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-860 compared to the A350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9534/e9534d9a462df24fe6f5d35c44efc2aac0a07f27" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-860 and A350 is 91 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aa2e/7aa2eb68098e196ed4282e9d6da7fecef663dec0" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The photograph below may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-860 and A350.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-860 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus TG-860 will provide extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer TG-860 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e6c1/4e6c1068af2869252502542813b4a7881d2ba3e5" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eacde/eacde929cd660640f3428a644924f5b808f9d89e" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony A350 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2008-06-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) | 674 gr (1.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 65 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 595 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $279 | $600 |