Olympus TG-860 vs Sony TX1
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced August 2009
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony TX1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-860 and Sony TX1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the TG-860 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") use different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-860 was manufactured 5 years later than the TX1 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-860 grades versus the TX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Sony TX1
TG-860 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | August 2009 | Fresher by 67 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Olympus TG-860
TX1 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Sony TX1
TG-860 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-860 features physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony TX1 has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-860 and Sony TX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-860 versus the TX1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-860 and TX1 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-860 and TX1.
As you can tell, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-860 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-860 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent TG-860 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-860 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $279 | $350 |