Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a092/2a092ddc3a33aceaaaea152b15c17049a1980cec" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 front"
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Superseded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Announced June 2014
- Newer Model is Panasonic FZ2500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic FZ1000, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the FZ1000 (20MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-870 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-870 was released 20 months later than the FZ1000 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-870 matches up versus the FZ1000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Panasonic FZ1000
TG-870 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | ![]() | June 2014 | More recent by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus TG-870
FZ1000 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic FZ1000
TG-870 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 921k | Same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-870 enjoys external dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 has proportions of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") having a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-870 and the FZ1000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b2fe/1b2fe0f5b9a6c81f8347007eac650d53d3d6c930" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and FZ1000 is 91 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48d14/48d14bbd48149b57dd7a740decaf798804d85060" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The visual here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and FZ1000.
All in all, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-870 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Panasonic FZ1000 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The newer TG-870 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ca51/4ca519d55bfa92053f7207458bcea3e7c424b8fb" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a84c/5a84cc5f5d9115e4dedf07d7c4f7479fe0dd2c2c" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-01-06 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 921k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) | 831 grams (1.83 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $280 | $800 |