Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZR1
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-ZX1
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic ZR1, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and ZR1 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-870 was unveiled 6 years after the ZR1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-870 scores vs the ZR1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Panasonic ZR1
| TG-870 | ZR1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2016 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 79 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus TG-870
| ZR1 | TG-870 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic ZR1
| TG-870 | ZR1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-870 offers outer measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR1 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic ZR1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-870 against the ZR1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and ZR1 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by seeing specs. The picture below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and ZR1.
All in all, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-870 to show more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern TG-870 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-01-06 | 2009-07-27 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $280 |
