Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax P80
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
95 Imaging
35 Features
23 Overall
30
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax P80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 125g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
- Revealed August 2009
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax P80 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus TG-870 versus Pentax P80, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and P80 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-870 was brought out 6 years after the P80 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax P80 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TG-870 scores against the P80 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax P80 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Pentax Optio P80. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Pentax P80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Pentax P80
TG-870 | P80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | August 2009 | More modern by 79 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax P80 over the Olympus TG-870
P80 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax P80
TG-870 | P80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax P80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 provides external dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Pentax P80 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-870 versus Pentax P80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-870 vs the P80.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and P80 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax P80 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and P80.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-870 to produce greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher TG-870 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax P80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax P80 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax Optio P80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax Optio P80 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-01-06 | 2009-08-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Prime |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.6-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $280 | $200 |