Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX2
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-870 versus Ricoh CX2, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-870 was introduced 6 years after the CX2 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-870 grades against the CX2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Ricoh CX2
| TG-870 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2016 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 78 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus TG-870
| CX2 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh CX2
| TG-870 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-870 provides outer measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-870 versus Ricoh CX2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-870 compared to the CX2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and CX2 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-870 and CX2.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-870 to provide more detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer TG-870 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2016-01-06 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $280 | $341 |