Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") offer different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-870 was unveiled 6 years after the GR Digital III which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-870 grades vs the GR Digital III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-870 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | July 2009 | More modern by 79 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus TG-870
GR Digital III | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-870 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 has got outside measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-870 compared to the GR Digital III.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and GR Digital III is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The image here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and GR Digital III.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-870 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Olympus TG-870 will resolve more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-870 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-01-06 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $280 | $399 |