Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung NX2000
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX1100
- Refreshed by Samsung NX3000
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-870 versus Samsung NX2000, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the NX2000 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the TG-870 (1/2.3") and NX2000 (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-870 was launched 2 years later than the NX2000 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-870 grades against the NX2000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Samsung NX2000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Samsung NX2000
TG-870 | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | November 2013 | More recent by 26 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus TG-870
NX2000 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Screen resolution | 1152k | 921k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung NX2000
TG-870 | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 provides outer dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has dimensions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-870 versus Samsung NX2000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-870 vs the NX2000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and NX2000 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and NX2000.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-870 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Samsung NX2000 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher TG-870 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung NX2000 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-01-06 | 2013-11-30 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 228g (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 340 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $280 | $599 |