Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung WB800F
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43


92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013

Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The TG-870 was launched 3 years later than the WB800F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-870 matches up against the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Samsung WB800F
TG-870 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 37 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus TG-870
WB800F | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung WB800F
TG-870 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 enjoys physical measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-870 vs the WB800F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.

Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The visual below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-870 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of images though you might want to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The newer TG-870 will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $280 | $300 |