Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25
70 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
![Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-500.jpg)
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FS25/Panasonic-FS25-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FS25, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FS25 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FS25 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The E-500 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the FS25 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-500 grades vs the FS25 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FS25
E-500 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus E-500
FS25 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2009 | ![]() | October 2005 | More recent by 39 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FS25
E-500 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS25 has sizing of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FS25 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-500 vs the FS25.
![Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-500-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FS25-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FS25 is 70 and 95 respectively.
![Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-500-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FS25-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The photograph here will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and FS25.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Panasonic FS25 will give you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
![Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-500-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FS25-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-500-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FS25-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 148 gr (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $600 | $230 |