Olympus TG-870 vs Sony TX200V
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Portability
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Superseded the Olympus TG-860
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-870 vs Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-870 was unveiled 3 years later than the TX200V and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the TG-870 grades vs the TX200V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-870 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony TX200V
| TG-870 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2016 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 48 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus TG-870
| TX200V | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.3" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 921k | Sharper display (+309k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony TX200V
| TG-870 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 has physical measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 vs Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-870 against the TX200V.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and TX200V is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The visual here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-870 and TX200V.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to resolve extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer TG-870 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Portrait photography factors
Sony TX200V Portrait photography factors
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Street photography information
Sony TX200V Street photography information
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
weather proofing
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than average (221 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers focus by touch
weather proof
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Sports photography details
Sony TX200V Sports photography details
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
weather proofing
good battery power (300 shots)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18MP)
has tracking focus
weather proof
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Travel photography information
Sony TX200V Travel photography information
good battery power (300 CIPA)
weather proofing
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (21mm)
more heavy than average (221 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
weather proof
offers focus by touch
MP count decent (18MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-870
Landscape photography with Sony TX200V
fairly wide (21mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
weather proofing
good battery power (300 per charge)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3.3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18MP)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Vlogging details
Sony TX200V Vlogging details
fairly wide (21mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone port
more heavy than average (221 grams)
pretty wide (28mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2016-01-06 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 129 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 220 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $280 | $500 |