Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66ec3/66ec316340c681a5b653dffd1598d7db3bc6344d" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front"
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-870 was launched 6 years later than the W320 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-870 matches up vs the W320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony W320
TG-870 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 73 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus TG-870
W320 | TG-870 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony W320
TG-870 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-870 offers external measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-870 vs the W320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fda6/4fda61caffa0a2d2eff4f90da6268f0ab720bda8" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and W320 is 91 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51ff5/51ff52accbd233c5ee29d91d913e140752da8fa8" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-870 and W320.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-870 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/286e2/286e273fd40eb05148639b54702c76a69c0708f4" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e0a/f5e0a6fcf41a040d36b4d296357a12d564942cd5" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2016-01-06 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 117 gr (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $280 | $269 |