Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K200D
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
61 Imaging
50 Features
41 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Launched September 2008
- Superseded the Pentax K100D S
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K200D, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is relatively similar but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and K200D (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-10 was manufactured 4 years later than the K200D and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the K200D in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Pentax K200D. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Pentax K200D
XZ-10 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | September 2008 | Fresher by 54 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus XZ-10
K200D | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Pentax K200D
XZ-10 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 has external measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K200D in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-10 versus the K200D.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and K200D is 91 and 61 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and K200D.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-10 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus XZ-10 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Pentax K200D |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2008-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 690 grams (1.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $428 | $600 |